An arguably overvalued market (equities, bitcoin, bonds), $ORCL (-$20), tech stocks' correction, uber confidence in deliverying investment ideas (like $SHAK$BABA ), bs "cash on the sidelines argument, lack of timestamping and memorialzing recs" etc. -- are some of the many reasons why I have been so critical of Fin TV.
When the tide is coming in they are heroes.
But when the tide goes out they are exposed - literally and financially.
Having the same permanently bullish guests (ad nauseum) and not exploring the negatives from non consensus guests (who reside outside the herd) is a poor and lazy programming recipe nor does it protect the investor (their principal stakeholders).
I will stop now - my point has been made often enough.
Nothing will change. @gnoble79 @KeithMcCullough
The author strongly criticizes financial television for its permanent bullishness, lack of accountability, and failure to present contrarian views, particularly in what they consider an overvalued market experiencing tech corrections.
Mentioned alongside SHAK as an example of overconfidently delivered investment ideas by financial media. The author's skepticism aligns with current market data, which shows BABA shares sliding amid broader market concerns.
The author highlights ORCL's recent $20 drop as a prime example of a tech stock correction that perma-bulls on financial TV fail to adequately address. This aligns with external data showing the stock dropping and facing scrutiny ahead of its upcoming earnings report.
Cited as an example of an investment idea pitched with 'uber confidence' on financial TV, implying skepticism about the validity of the bullish calls. External data supports this skepticism, showing recent rating downgrades and guidance cuts for the company.
事件 Earnings (EPS est 0.3431) · 2026-07-29
关键要点
The broader market, including equities, bitcoin, and bonds, is arguably overvalued.
Financial TV is dominated by permanently bullish guests who lack accountability and fail to timestamp their recommendations.
The media does a disservice to investors by ignoring non-consensus, negative perspectives.
Recent tech corrections and overconfidently pitched investment ideas expose the flaws of perma-bullish financial programming.
